• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
Search
EJPD
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
  • Sioi
  • Guidelines for Authors
  • Article submission
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy
Home Composition and microstructure of MTA and Aureoseal Plus: XRF, EDS, XRD and...

Composition and microstructure of MTA and Aureoseal Plus: XRF, EDS, XRD and FESEM evaluation

Authors:

  • L. Cianconi
  • P. Palopoli
  • V. Campanella
  • M. Mancini

ABSTRACT


Aim

The aim of this study was to determine the chemical composition and the phases' microstructure of Aureoseal Plus
(OGNA, Italy) and ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental, USA) and to compare their characteristics.

Methods

Study Design: Comparing Aureoseal Plus and ProRoot MTA microstructure by means of several analyses type. The chemical analysis
of the two cements was assessed following the UNI EN ISO 196-2 norm. X-Ray fluorescence (XRF) was used to determine the element
composition. The crystalline structure was analysed quantitatively using x-ray diffraction (XRD). Powders morphology was evaluated
using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) with backscattering detectors, and a field emission scanning electron microscope
(FESEM). Elemental analysis was performed by energy dispersive x-ray analysis (EDS).

Results

The semi-quantitative XRF
analysis showed the presence of heavy metal oxides in both cements. The XRD spectra of the two cements reported the presence of
dicalcium silicate, tricalcium silicate, tricalcium aluminate, tetracalcium aluminoferrite, bismuth oxide and gypsum. SEM analysis showed
that ProRoot MTA powder is less coarse and more homogeneous than Aureoseal. Both powders are formed by particles of different
shapes: round, prismatic and oblong. The EDS analysis showed that some ProRoot MTA particles, differently from Aureoseal, contain
Ca, Si, Al and Fe. Oblong particles in ProRoot and Aureoseal are rich of bismuth. CONCLUSIONS: The strong interest in developing
new Portland cement-based endodontic sealers will create materials with increased handling characteristics and physicochemical
properties. A thorough investigation on two cement powders was carried out by using XRF, XRD, SEM and EDS analysis. To date there
was a lack of studies on Aureoseal Plus. This cement is similar in composition to ProRoot MTA. Despite that it has distinctive elements
that could improve its characteristics, resulting in a good alternative to MTA.

PLUMX METRICS

Download PDF

Publication date:

Dec /2016

Keywords:

aureoseal plus, eds, fesem, proroot mta, sem, xrd, xrf

Issue:

Vol.17 – n.4/2016

Page:

281 – 285

Publisher:

Ariesdue

Cite:


Harvard: L. Cianconi, P. Palopoli, V. Campanella, M. Mancini (2016) "Composition and microstructure of MTA and Aureoseal Plus: XRF, EDS, XRD and FESEM evaluation", European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 17(4), pp281-285. doi: https://www.ejpd.eu/wp-content/uploads/pdf/EJPD_2016_4_4.pdf
Vancouver: L. Cianconi, P. Palopoli, V. Campanella, M. Mancini. Composition and microstructure of MTA and Aureoseal Plus: XRF, EDS, XRD and FESEM evaluation. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry [Internet]. 2016Dec.1 [cited 2023Mar.25];17(4):281-285. Available from: https://www.ejpd.eu/abstract-pubmed/composition-and-microstructure-of-mta-and-aureoseal-plus-xrf-eds-xrd-and-fesem-evaluation/
MLA: L. Cianconi, P. Palopoli, V. Campanella, M. Mancini Composition and microstructure of MTA and Aureoseal Plus: XRF, EDS, XRD and FESEM evaluation. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2016;17(4):281-285

Copyright (c) 2021 Ariesdue

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Linkedin
WhatsApp
Email
Print
    webfactory.bm24
    Editor in chief: dott. Luigi Paglia
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    powered by Ariesdue

    CONTACT US
    • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Current Issue
    • Early access
    • Archive
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    Registrazione del Tribunale di Milano n. 285 del 14.04.1998 | ROC 1946 - 26.09.2001
    /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - inizio */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - fine */ /* ----------------------------------------- */