• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
Search
EJPD
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
  • Sioi
  • Guidelines for Authors
  • Article submission
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy
Home In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation...

In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing

Authors:

  • G. F. Ferrazzano
    Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Oral Sciences, Section of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • A. Ingenito
    Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Oral Sciences, Section of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • B. Alcidi
    Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Oral Sciences, Section of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • G. Sangianantoni
    Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Oral Sciences, Section of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • M. G. Schiavone
    Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Oral Sciences, Section of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
  • T. Cantile
    Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Oral Sciences, Section of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.01

ABSTRACT


Aim

Fissure sealants are effective in preventing caries. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of two different enamel surface preparation techniques for pit and fissure sealing.

Methods

Sixty extracted sound third molars were used. For each tooth, the mesial half of the occlusal fissures was treated with ultrasound diamond tip T1 mounted on an ultrasonic handpiece, while the distal half with conventional diamond bur. The teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups (n = 30/each). Group 1 samples were stored in distilled water at 4 °C. For group 2 samples, sealing of occlusal fissures was performed according to standard procedures. Bucco-lingual cuts parallel to the long axis of the tooth were made in order to separate the two different types of preparations. The effects of the executed procedures were assessed with SEM.

Results

Surfaces prepared with ultrasound system showed the presence of residual debris and appeared more irregular than surfaces prepared with traditional bur system. Furthermore, images showed the presence of cracks on the bottom and on the walls of the ultrasound prepared fissures.

Conclusion

Conventional bur surface treatment showed a better performance when compared to ultrasound preparation and could probably ensure superior sealant retention.

PLUMX METRICS

Download PDF

Publication date:

December /2017

Keywords:

bur preparation, dental fissure sealants, ultrasound tips

Issue:

Vol.18 – n.4/2017

Page:

263 – 267

Publisher:

Ariesdue

Cite:


Harvard: G. F. Ferrazzano, A. Ingenito, B. Alcidi, G. Sangianantoni, M. G. Schiavone, T. Cantile (2017) "In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing", European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 18(4), pp263-267. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.04.01
Vancouver: G. F. Ferrazzano, A. Ingenito, B. Alcidi, G. Sangianantoni, M. G. Schiavone, T. Cantile. In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry [Internet]. 2017Dec.1 [cited 2023Mar.25];18(4):263-267. Available from: https://www.ejpd.eu/abstract-pubmed/in-vitro-performance-of-ultrasound-enamel-preparation-compared-with-classical-bur-preparation-on-pit-and-fissure-sealing/
MLA: G. F. Ferrazzano, A. Ingenito, B. Alcidi, G. Sangianantoni, M. G. Schiavone, T. Cantile In vitro performance of ultrasound enamel preparation compared with classical bur preparation on pit and fissure sealing. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2017;18(4):263-267

Copyright (c) 2021 Ariesdue

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Linkedin
WhatsApp
Email
Print
    webfactory.bm24
    Editor in chief: dott. Luigi Paglia
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    powered by Ariesdue

    CONTACT US
    • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Current Issue
    • Early access
    • Archive
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    Registrazione del Tribunale di Milano n. 285 del 14.04.1998 | ROC 1946 - 26.09.2001
    /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - inizio */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - fine */ /* ----------------------------------------- */