• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
Search
EJPD
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
  • Sioi
  • Guidelines for Authors
  • Article submission
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy
Home Clinical evidence and literature to compare two different therapeutic protocols in tooth...

Clinical evidence and literature to compare two different therapeutic protocols in tooth avulsion

Authors:

  • L. Giannetti
    University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, School of Dentistry Department of Paediatric Dentistry
  • A. Murri
    University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, School of Dentistry Department of Paediatric Dentistry

ABSTRACT


Aim

This is to assess the priority in tooth avulsion: replantation as quickly as possible and deferred endodontic treatment, or
replantation and elimination of every irritating stimulus for the periodontal ligament. The objective is to establish a univocal protocol by
analysing and comparing the various components of these therapeutic procedures.

Methods

Study design: 20
patients were selected and divided into 2 groups: in group A we focused our attention on the rapidity of replantation, in group B we
focused on the elimination of the necrotic pulp and every possible irritating stimulus that might lead to root resorption of inflammatory
nature.

Results

Clinically, dental mobility seems to be greater in the first group. However after 15 days teeth have a comparable
mobility and after one month they all show a mobility degree 1. Radiographically a greater incidence of resorption can be observed in
group A compared to group B as in the first one a higher number of replanted teeth undergo resorption. Such lesions have the tendency
to remain constant or even increase. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study seem to take only one direction: extraoral endodontic
therapy.

PLUMX METRICS

Publication date:

September /2006

Keywords:

endodontics, therapy, tooth avulsion

Issue:

Vol.7 – n.3/2006

Page:

122 – 130

Publisher:

Ariesdue

Cite:


Harvard: L. Giannetti, A. Murri (2006) "Clinical evidence and literature to compare two different therapeutic protocols in tooth avulsion", European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 7(3), pp122-130. doi:
Vancouver: L. Giannetti, A. Murri. Clinical evidence and literature to compare two different therapeutic protocols in tooth avulsion. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry [Internet]. 2006Sep.1 [cited 2023Mar.25];7(3):122-130. Available from: https://www.ejpd.eu/abstract-pubmed/clinical-evidence-and-literature-to-compare-two-different-therapeutic-protocols-in-tooth-avulsion/
MLA: L. Giannetti, A. Murri Clinical evidence and literature to compare two different therapeutic protocols in tooth avulsion. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2006;7(3):122-130

Copyright (c) 2021 Ariesdue

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Linkedin
WhatsApp
Email
Print
    webfactory.bm24
    Editor in chief: dott. Luigi Paglia
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    powered by Ariesdue

    CONTACT US
    • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Current Issue
    • Early access
    • Archive
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    Registrazione del Tribunale di Milano n. 285 del 14.04.1998 | ROC 1946 - 26.09.2001
    /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - inizio */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - fine */ /* ----------------------------------------- */