• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
Search
EJPD
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
  • Sioi
  • Guidelines for Authors
  • Article submission
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy
Home Clinical and radiographic evaluation of indirect pulp capping with three different materials:...

Clinical and radiographic evaluation of indirect pulp capping with three different materials: a 2-year follow-up study

Authors:

  • A. T. Gurcan
    Assistant Professor, Altinbas University School of Dentistry, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey
  • F. Seymen
    Professor, Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Paediatric Dentistry, Istanbul, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.02.04

ABSTRACT


Aim

Indirect pulp capping (IPC) is a treatment that preserves pulp vitality. Several materials have been used for this procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and clinical outcomes of TheraCal LC (Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) and to compare it with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Pro Root MTA, Dentsply Tulsa, Johnson City, TN, USA) and calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] (Dycal, Dentsply De Trey Konstanz, Germany) biomaterials in IPC treatment.

Material and methods

A total of 295 teeth, including second primary molars and first permanent molars with IPC indications from healthy and cooperative children aged between 4–15 years, were included in this study. Teeth were divided into three groups according to the materials used for pulp capping. Indirect pulp treatment was applied using Dycal for 91 teeth, ProRoot MTA for 89 teeth and TheraCal LC for 115 teeth. Primary molars were restored with the compomer material, and permanent molars were restored with the resin composite material. Restorations were evaluated with the Modified United States Public Health Service (modified USPHS) criteria. Clinical and radiographic findings were evaluated for 24 months at follow-up. Statistics: Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 22 (IBM SPSS, Turkey) program, with descriptive statistical methods (means, standard deviations) and Chi-square, Fisher’s exact test, and Yates’s continuity correction (p<0.05 significance level) to evaluate the data.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences between the materials (p>0.05). The respective success rates of ProRoot MTA, Theracal LC, and Dycal were 94.4%, 87.8%, and 84.6%. There was no statistically significant difference between primary and permanent teeth according to the modified USPHS criteria (p>0.05).

Conclusion

These results support the idea that the success of IPC is independent from the capping material. Recently produced calcium-silicate based materials can also be used for IPC. The most important factors are to apply the indirect pulp treatment carefully, avoiding bacterial contamination, and to seal the teeth with hermetic restoration. More clinical studies with longer follow-up periods are required for understanding the clinical efficiency of these materials.

PLUMX METRICS

Download PDF

Publication date:

June /2019

Issue:

Vol.20 – n.2/2019

Page:

105 – 110

Publisher:

Ariesdue

Cite:


Harvard: A. T. Gurcan, F. Seymen (2019) "Clinical and radiographic evaluation of indirect pulp capping with three different materials: a 2-year follow-up study", European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 20(2), pp105-110. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2019.20.02.04
Vancouver: A. T. Gurcan, F. Seymen. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of indirect pulp capping with three different materials: a 2-year follow-up study. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry [Internet]. 2019Jun.1 [cited 2025Dec.05];20(2):105-110. Available from: https://www.ejpd.eu/abstract-pubmed/clinical-and-radiographic-evaluation-of-indirect-pulp-capping-with-three-different-materials-a-2-year-follow-up-study/
MLA: A. T. Gurcan, F. Seymen Clinical and radiographic evaluation of indirect pulp capping with three different materials: a 2-year follow-up study. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2019;20(2):105-110

Copyright (c) 2021 Ariesdue

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Linkedin
WhatsApp
Email
Print
    webfactory.bm24
    Editor in chief: dott. Luigi Paglia
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    powered by Ariesdue

    CONTACT US
    • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Current Issue
    • Early access
    • Archive
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    Registrazione del Tribunale di Milano n. 285 del 14.04.1998 | ROC 1946 - 26.09.2001
    /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - inizio */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - fine */ /* ----------------------------------------- */