• About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
Search
EJPD
  • About
  • Editorial Board
  • Current Issue
  • Early access
  • Archive
  • Sioi
  • Guidelines for Authors
  • Article submission
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy
Home Bonding effectiveness of different adhesion approaches to unground versus ground primary tooth...

Bonding effectiveness of different adhesion approaches to unground versus ground primary tooth enamel

Authors:

  • M. S. Knirsch
    Department Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • C. C. Bonifcio
    Department Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • A. M. Shimaoka
    Department Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • A. P. Andrade
    Department Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • R. C. Carvalho
    Department Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil

ABSTRACT


Aim

This study aims to evaluate the bonding effectiveness of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in on
intact and ground primary tooth enamel. Study Design: Sixty primary incisors were divided into 6 groups according to the
adhesive system (etch-and-rinse - Adper Single Bond 2 - SB, 2 steps self-etch -Clearfil SE Bond - SE, and 1 step self-etch -
One Up Bond F Plus OBF) and to the substrate (ground or intact enamel): G1-SB/intact enamel; G2-SE/intact enamel; G3-
OBF/intact enamel; G4-SB/ground enamel; G5- SE/ground enamel and G6-OBF/ground enamel.

Methods

Microshear
bond test specimens were prepared with microhybrid composite and after 24h of water storage the microshear test was
performed. Statistics Data were submitted to statistical analysis using two-way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p<0.05).

Results

Comparing the enamel characteristics (ground or intact) only when SE was used a statistically significant
difference was found, as G2 (21.124.52) was statistically lower than G5 (33.295.44). Among the intact
enamel groups, SB (26.117.56) was statistically superior to SE (21.124.52) and OBF (17.013.96).
However, when comparisons were made among groups of ground enamel, SE (33.295.44) was significantly higher
than SB (26.358.18) and OBF (17.523.46).

Conclusion

The two-step self-etch adhesive system is a
reliable alternative to etch and rinse adhesive systems on both ground and intact primary enamel

PLUMX METRICS

Publication date:

June /2009

Keywords:

adhesion, bond strength, primary teeth

Issue:

Vol.10 – n.2/2009

Page:

83 – 89

Publisher:

Ariesdue

Cite:


Harvard: M. S. Knirsch, C. C. Bonifcio, A. M. Shimaoka, A. P. Andrade, R. C. Carvalho (2009) "Bonding effectiveness of different adhesion approaches to unground versus ground primary tooth enamel", European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 10(2), pp83-89. doi:
Vancouver: M. S. Knirsch, C. C. Bonifcio, A. M. Shimaoka, A. P. Andrade, R. C. Carvalho. Bonding effectiveness of different adhesion approaches to unground versus ground primary tooth enamel. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry [Internet]. 2009Jun.1 [cited 2025May.13];10(2):83-89. Available from: https://www.ejpd.eu/abstract-pubmed/bonding-effectiveness-of-different-adhesion-approaches-to-unground-versus-ground-primary-tooth-enamel/
MLA: M. S. Knirsch, C. C. Bonifcio, A. M. Shimaoka, A. P. Andrade, R. C. Carvalho Bonding effectiveness of different adhesion approaches to unground versus ground primary tooth enamel. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2009;10(2):83-89

Copyright (c) 2021 Ariesdue

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
Linkedin
WhatsApp
Email
Print
    webfactory.bm24
    Editor in chief: dott. Luigi Paglia
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    powered by Ariesdue

    CONTACT US
    • About
    • Editorial Board
    • Current Issue
    • Early access
    • Archive
    European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry © | ISSN (Online): 2035-648X
    Registrazione del Tribunale di Milano n. 285 del 14.04.1998 | ROC 1946 - 26.09.2001
    /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - inizio */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* ----------------------------------------- */ /* Modello di contenuto: Abstracts PubMed - fine */ /* ----------------------------------------- */